Icahn Enterprises wins dismissal of investor lawsuit

Carl Icahn’s funding firm Icahn Enterprises received the dismissal of a lawsuit claiming it artificially inflated its share worth by issuing unsustainably excessive dividends to assist the billionaire investor receive massive quantities of non-public loans.

In a choice on Friday, U.S. District Choose Ok. Michael Moore in Miami stated shareholders within the proposed class motion failed to point out that the corporate made materials misrepresentations or omissions and did so with an intent to defraud.

Legal professionals for the shareholders didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark. A spokesman for Icahn Enterprises didn’t instantly reply to the same request. Moore gave the shareholders till Oct. 14 to file an amended criticism.

Icahn Enterprises shares have fallen greater than three-quarters since Could 2023, when the short-selling agency Hindenburg Analysis questioned its dividends and Icahn’s borrowing, and accused Icahn of overseeing a “Ponzi-like financial construction.”

Final month Icahn agreed with out admitting wrongdoing to pay $2 million to settle U.S. Securities and Alternate Fee civil prices that he did not disclose his important borrowing in opposition to the shares.

The shareholders stated Icahn Enterprises’ true well being turned evident as its Auto Elements Plus enterprise went bankrupt, the corporate slashed its dividend and Icahn renegotiated his loans.

Icahn owns about 85% of his firm’s shares, and personally misplaced many billions of {dollars} because the share worth fell.

In his 28-page choice, Moore cited the corporate’s disclosures that it may decrease dividends, and stated its common disclosures about Carl Icahn’s borrowing have been adequate to alert buyers to the dangers.

He additionally stated Icahn Enterprises’ 2021 annual report disclosed Carl Icahn’s share pledges, and that there have been no allegations that any defendant performed insider buying and selling.

“This conduct means that the person defendants, together with Icahn, believed within the long-term worth of IEP and is inconsistent with the idea that defendants have been engaged in a scheme to artificially inflate the inventory worth for private acquire,” Moore wrote.

The case is Kosowsky v Icahn Enterprises LP et al, U.S. District Court docket, Southern District of Florida, No. 23-21773.